VISUAL IMAGE PROCESSING LABORATORY
A research project on computational vision science.

Funded by Generalitat Valenciana under grant AICO-2020-136 (VIPLab) and CIAICO/2022/051 (IMaLeVICS) 

A comparative analysis of machine learning methods for display characterization

Nov 15, 2024 | Publications

Methodology and Study Approach

Khleef Almutairi, Samuel Morillas Gómez, Pedro Latorre Carmona, Makan Dansoko and María José Gacto. Displays, 85, 2024, 102849.

We are thrilled to announce that the IMaLeVICS team has published a new article in Displays titled «A Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Methods for Display Characterisation.» This research represents a significant advancement in the field of display technology, offering insights into how different machine learning models can be applied to achieve accurate colour reproduction across various display types, including LCD, OLED, and QLED.

The primary goal of our study was to explore and compare several machine learning methods for display characterisation. Our models were developed using high-precision colourimetric data, where RGB values (device-dependent) were transformed into XYZ coordinates (device-independent) to ensure reliable colour reproduction across devices. By analysing how effectively each method captured these relationships, we aimed to identify the best approaches for creating high-fidelity displays.

Key Findings and Contributions

Our results demonstrated the effectiveness of fuzzy inference systems (FMID) for colour accuracy and interpretability. Key findings include:

  • Accuracy Across Display Types: FMID models offered a strong balance between performance and interpretability, outperforming other methods in visual colour accuracy, particularly when using the ΔE00 visual error metric.
  • Insights into RGB-XYZ Relationships: Unlike other methods, FMID provided valuable interpretative insights into how RGB input data is translated into XYZ coordinates. This interpretability could prove essential for future calibration and optimisation of display devices.
  • Comparison with Other Methods: By comparing FMID with neural networks and decision trees, we highlighted the strengths and limitations of each approach. While neural networks offered high accuracy, FMID distinguished itself with an optimal combination of performance and transparency, making it especially suitable for characterisation purposes.

Conclusion

This study provides evidence that machine learning methods, especially fuzzy inference systems, are highly effective for display characterisation. They not only perform competitively in terms of accuracy but also deliver the added benefit of model interpretability, offering a deeper understanding of display behaviour across different device types.